Ensuring data quality means establishing a continuous process of monitoring your data, proactively identifying any issues that arise, and taking timely action to correct them. It’s about making sure your data is accurate, complete, consistent, and reliable, so it can effectively drive informed decisions and fuel innovation. But what happens when that data is riddled with errors, inconsistencies, and gaps?
Think about the last time you saw a glaring error on a dashboard. Or perhaps you’re a data analyst who’s spent hours wrestling with a dataset, only to find crucial information missing or inaccurate. These frustrating scenarios are all too common, and they highlight a critical issue: many organizations fail to recognize that ensuring data quality is not a one-time fix, but an ongoing process.
Often, companies approach data quality with a “set it and forget it” mentality. They might initiate a data quality assessment – a project-based approach to identify and cleanse problematic data. While this can provide temporary relief, it fails to address the root cause of the issue: ensuring data quality is a dynamic challenge that requires continuous monitoring and improvement. Without addressing the underlying systems and processes that contribute to poor data quality, the same errors will continue to creep in, undermining your data’s value and hindering your organization’s ability to thrive. To truly succeed, organizations must prioritize ensuring data quality throughout its lifecycle.
Why Data Quality Degrades
Even with the best intentions and a thorough initial cleansing, data quality can still degrade over time. Why? Because data is not static; it’s constantly evolving, and the factors influencing its quality are numerous and complex. Here are just a few of the common culprits that make ensuring data quality a constant challenge:
- Evolving Business Processes: As your business grows and adapts, so do its processes. Users might start entering data differently into applications, leading to inconsistencies and errors. Perhaps a new product line is introduced, requiring data capture that wasn’t previously considered.
- Data Model Changes: The structure of your data can change over time. Maybe the data model is updated, and the information analysts rely on is moved or transformed. Without proper documentation and communication, this can lead to confusion and broken reports.
- Technical Glitches: Technical issues, such as bugs in applications or infrastructure failures, can prevent data from being stored correctly. This can result in missing values, corrupted data, or even complete data loss.
- ETL Pipeline Errors: Errors in your Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) pipelines can introduce inconsistencies and inaccuracies. Perhaps a transformation rule is incorrect, or the pipeline is sensitive to changes in data types or lengths.
- Lack of Data Governance: Without clear data governance policies and procedures, it’s easy for data quality to slip. This includes things like data ownership, data definitions, and data validation rules.
All these factors contribute to a gradual decline in data quality. Without ongoing monitoring and maintenance, your data warehouse or data lake slowly becomes less reliable and less valuable. Essentially, data teams are left in the dark, unaware of the issues and changes that are eroding the usability of their data every single day. This highlights the crucial need for continuous monitoring and proactive measures to ensure data quality.
The Pitfalls of Project-Based Data Quality Improvement
While traditional data quality improvement projects offer a structured approach to cleansing and improving data, they often fall short of ensuring data quality over the long haul. Here’s why:
- Static Solutions for Dynamic Problems: Data is constantly changing, and new data quality issues are bound to emerge over time. A one-time project might fix existing problems, but it fails to address the ongoing nature of data quality management. It’s like patching a leaky roof – it might hold up for a while, but eventually, new leaks will appear.
- Limited Tooling and Techniques: Many data quality teams rely on rudimentary tools and techniques for data profiling and assessment. This often involves manual processes like exporting data samples to spreadsheets or writing ad-hoc SQL queries and Python scripts. Such approaches are not only time-consuming but also lack scalability and repeatability.
- Lack of Reproducibility: Due to the reliance on manual processes and disparate tools, it becomes challenging to reproduce data quality checks in the future. Even if the same issues resurface, the entire data quality improvement project might need to be repeated, leading to wasted effort and resources.
- Reactive Approach: Traditional projects are often reactive, triggered by user complaints or visible data errors. This means that data quality issues might persist for a long time before they are detected and addressed, potentially causing significant damage in the meantime.
In essence, traditional data quality improvement projects offer a temporary fix, but they fail to establish a sustainable system for ensuring data quality over the long term. To truly achieve high-quality data, we need to move beyond these limitations and embrace a more proactive and continuous approach.
Data quality best practices - a step-by-step guide to improve data quality
- Learn the best practices in starting and scaling data quality
- Learn how to find and manage data quality issues
How to Ensure Data Quality with Data Observability
The biggest challenge to maintaining data quality is the lack of continuous monitoring and timely incident management. Traditional data quality projects often miss this crucial aspect, leaving organizations vulnerable to data degradation and its associated consequences.
One step toward a more proactive approach is data quality monitoring. This involves running predefined data quality checks on a regular schedule (e.g., daily) and setting up alerts to notify data owners and engineers when violations occur. While helpful, this approach still relies heavily on the initial data quality assessment to define the checks, leaving room for blind spots.
Consider a scenario where a field previously marked as “required” in a form is no longer mandatory. Initially, users might continue filling it out of habit. But gradually, more and more users will leave it blank. This gradual shift in data patterns might go unnoticed by traditional data quality checks, especially if the field was not initially considered a risk due to its previously mandatory status. Over time, the increasing number of null values can significantly impact the usability of this data for analytics and reporting.
This is where data observability comes in. Modern data observability platforms go beyond simply monitoring predefined checks. They leverage time-series analysis and machine learning to continuously analyze the structure and distribution of your data, detecting subtle shifts and anomalies that might indicate underlying data quality issues. This proactive approach helps identify problems early on, even before they significantly impact your business.
Moreover, data observability platforms shift the focus from static reporting to actionable incident management. Instead of simply generating reports, they provide automated workflows to notify data operations teams and data owners about new issues, enabling them to quickly assess and address problems in real-time. This ensures that data quality remains a top priority and that your data pipelines continue to deliver reliable, trustworthy information.
By implementing data observability, organizations can move from a reactive to a proactive approach to data quality management, ensuring that their data remains a valuable asset for driving business success.
What is the DQOps Data Quality Operations Center
DQOps is a data observability platform designed to monitor data and assess the data quality trust score with data quality KPIs. DQOps provides extensive support for configuring data quality checks, applying configuration by data quality policies, detecting anomalies, and managing the data quality incident workflow.
DQOps is a platform that combines the functionality of a data quality platform to perform the data quality assessment of data assets. It is also a complete data observability platform that can monitor data and measure data quality metrics at table level to measure its health scores with data quality KPIs.
You can set up DQOps locally or in your on-premises environment to learn how DQOps can monitor data sources and ensure data quality within a data platform. Follow the DQOps documentation, go through the DQOps getting started guide to learn how to set up DQOps locally, and try it.
You may also be interested in our free eBook, “A step-by-step guide to improve data quality.” The eBook documents our proven process for managing data quality issues and ensuring a high level of data quality over time. This is a great resource to learn about data quality.
